Grand Central Terminal
As far as I can remember, today was the first day I ever stepped into Grand Central Terminal. I was told it was odd since I’m a New Yorker, but I grew up on Long Island and now I live on the west side. That’s all Penn Station, including my Amtrak trips. It’s amazing how nice Grand Central is compared to Penn. Penn supposedly used to have a nice look as well, and some older shots in the Wikipedia article and Google Image Search seem to confirm.
The reason for my monumental first trip wasn’t actually trip-related, it was just to nab some food of all things. The “food court” matches the look, and is also a few notches nicer than the typical food you’d find in a train station.
The Slow Monster
I might as well make another Cloverfield monster post, following up my last one. Someone took the trailer and made it real sloooow.
Cloverfield Monster Screenshot
I was checking out the new Cloverfield trailer (thanks to a pointer from Chris Thilk) and decided to take a screenshot of (the part of the) monster that they show from the 1080p version.
A tentacle, perhaps?
So Confusing
The Boston… Yanks
I doubt they’d take that name today.
Twit Whiz
It’s never too early for a cheesesteak reference.
I use Twitter randomly.
A couple of months ago I was listening to the radio online (XM Lucy I think) and Beck came on. I tried twitting “get crazy with the cheez whiz” over IM. No dice. For whatever reason, Twitter did not not want to get crazy with the Cheez Whiz.
So I tried it over the web. Nothing. So I had Tom try it. Nothing.
I actually emailed support too. It was to rank up there as one of the dumber support tickets, but we were just curious as to why it didn’t go through.
Now, two months later, support gave me a response, although it still doesn’t work.
Is it the cheez? The whiz? Only the combo? Or can we just not get crazy with it?
Sportsline Becomes CBS Sports
CBS Sportsline is now officially CBS Sports. The website had a mini-facelift to go along with the rebranding. It’s slightly more readable than before if nothing else.
CBS decided to rebrand in order to cross-brand between websites and television easier, at least that’s the explanation given on paidContent.org.
Normally it’s a smart move, and it may be here, but Sportsline is an established internet brand. It’s also been CBS Sportsline for a while. Recently, a friend of mine didn’t realize you could use “www.” and not “cbs.”. That says something about the strength of the name and the association between CBS and Sportsline.
However, CBS Sports makes it more of a big media company. Sportsline existed solely on the internet, despite being CBS Sportsline. CBS Sports is on tv. CBS Sports is the NFL, March Madness and the PGA, among other things.
What CBS Sports isn’t is its own channel. In that regard, it’s like NBC Sports on tv, but online CBS is clearly a top player, where NBC is not.
The appearance of having some form of independence was no doubt a plus. It’ll be interesting to see if the rename has any effect on the website’s reputation. paidContent.org cites SportsBusiness Daily (paid subscription required) mentioning that the company is concerned about the rebranding possibly harming fantasy sports operations.
Fox Sports is currently one of the sports website leaders, thanks in part to its contract with MSN, and also a network of local television channels. Fox also has its college stations, Fox Sports Español, Fox Soccer and the Speed Channel.
ABC Sports ceased to exist a few years ago. Instead, the network chose to brand its sports programming “ESPN on ABC”, capitalizing on the popularity of its cable channel’s brand.
The only non-television network sports website that rivals the top players in traffic is Yahoo! Sports. Yahoo! has cleaned up the site over the past year, as well as adding more original content. Yahoo!, like Sportsline, has leveraged its fantasy sports section to drive traffic to its content.
Connection Insurance
A few weeks ago I went a couple of nights without my cable modem (or tv) due to no-reason-given by Time Warner. While it’s not the end of the world by any means, it’s difficult to have unplanned access disruptions when you work on the web.
During the downtime I learned that all available wireless networks were secure. Over twenty of them, all locked down. Pretty impressive considering a few years ago it was easy to hop from one unsecure network to another if your connection was down (although most in the building have the same provider, so it was usually pointless anyway).
Going to an internet cafe or a local Starbucks is always an option, but I don’t find that the easiest way to get work done.
So I’m wondering, why don’t companies offer connection insurance?
More and more people depend on their internet connection for work, entertainment and their home phone connections.
Time Warner is currently the fastest connection I can have from my home right now. If Verizon DSL wants to make any money off of me, they can charge a low fee, something like $30 yearly to have their connection available. If I need to use their connection, which gets triggered by a certain amount of data within a certain amount of time, then I get charged a low per-day fee, something like $5.
This isn’t limited to cable and DSL (or FIOS, if you’re lucky). Broadband wireless could also be a “connection insurer”. They all just need to be prepared for possible network spikes if a competitor has big problems.
Between outages and upgrades, connection insurers could make a decent amount of money on volume.
The Vanishing Vick
The allegations against Michael Vick aren’t just forcing him to miss out on football, but his name is being erased from all products baring his name. Nike suspended their contract (no pay) with Vick and Reebok stopped selling Vick jerseys.
Upper Deck also made an announcement that they were not going to include Vick cards in any future football card sets, and that they were stopping the sale of any Vick merchandise on their website, namely autographed memorabilia.
I wonder if any of this will actually put a premium on Vick products. He still has fans out there, and there are still those that will not condemn anyone until due process has taken place. Any new Vick product that gets pulled will be available in very limited supply, at least for now. Any possible demand could create an interesting market.
Xboxing Again
I received my Xbox 360 today after sending it out a month ago because of the red ring of death.
It seems to be fine again. I had very few problems with it before the red ring.
Included with the console was a card for a one-month gold live subscription. A proper thing to do seeing as I couldn’t use my subscription for a month.
I’ve yet to test the movie we downloaded just before we had to send it in. Blood Diamond, and in HD. You have 14-days to watch the movie, and 24 hours once you start it. I hope I don’t have to pay for it again, or pester support more. I tried asking Xbox support about this on the phone and wasn’t understood. I then tried emailing and was told I’d have to call. Hopefully I won’t have to.
First Impressions of Safari for Windows
Apple introduced Safari 3 beta for Windows today. Formerly Mac-only, the Safari browser is now available for XP and Vista machines.
After an initial reaction of “why?”, as it doesn’t seem likely Safari will gain market share on IE or Firefox, it is nice for Windows-only developers who want to build Safari-compatible applications. Apple is currently promoting Safari as a type of developing environment for the upcoming iPhone (Wired’s take).
If the Windows version does render webpages exactly like it’s Mac counterpart, it’s at least useful for Windows-based developers if nothing else.
After a quick install, I now have a Safari icon on my desktop right below the Opera “O”.
So, nothing too in-depth yet, but a couple of quick first impressions.
Font smoothing has looked horrible on three machines I’ve installed it on (two XP, one 2003 - and yes, Safari is not listed for 2003). Two had cleartype on to begin with, so I’m not sure why font smoothing needs to be on over that, but I’ve looked at it on other machines as well and it’s just fuzzy everywhere. CRT, LCD, cleartype or nothing. I’ve set it to “light” to keep pages as readable as possible. I’m surprised there’s no option to just turn it off. If font smoothing looks good for anyone, I’d like to know what your setup is.
Memmmmmmory. Safari inflates fast. No browser has good memory management for me. Firefox, my preference, leaks like crazy, but I do have a number of add-ons installed. Safari also wants all my memory to perform any actions. It spikes hard on actions. To test, just open up your task manager, a webpage in Safari and then mouseover some links (even just text links with hover actions). IE doesn’t exactly excel here, but if you have a lot running in the background, Safari seems to cause the biggest pause out of the three.
The status bar is so dark it’s barely readable. I can’t recall what it looks like on a Mac, but I do remember that it’s not on by default.
I wouldn’t mind the addition of a few more common shortcuts used by other browsers.
If you’ve got a solid connection, rendering speed can be noticably faster with Safari on heavy pages.
I’ve crashed it a few times on 2003. It wasn’t made for that, but I should point out I’ve had no problems with my other browsers. Still, a beta product on an OS it’s not supposed to be on, so I’ll have to overlook that.
However, I’ve also crashed it a couple of times on XP with normal browsing.
A few frivolous quirks aside, Safari is still a beta product. It can wind up being a nice browsing experience, especially for multi-OS users who aren’t addicted to Firefox already, but I’m not too sure how many of those there are and outside of developers, there’s not much of a pull to download it yet.