Sports

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Re-Established Importance

Headlining every sports site at some point today has been a story about Barry Bonds and steroids:

Juicy Details - ESPN
Book details slugger’s steroid use - Sportsline
Bonds bombshell: Book details slugger’s steroid use - CNNSI, as well as CNN.com

Carrying the AP story:
Book alleges extensive steroid use by Bonds - Fox Sports
Book details Barry Bonds’ doping program - TSN
Report: Bonds began using steroids, vast array of other drugs, in 1998 - Yahoo! Sports
Book gives dope on Bonds - Sportsnet

This will no doubt be the biggest story in the sports world for some time to come.

Is this shocking?  If the story about Bonds is all true, or even partially true, not at all.

The story itself comes from an excerpt from “Game of Shadows,” which appears in the March 13 issue of Sports Illustrated.  “Game of Shadows” is a book written by two San Francisco Chronicle reporters, Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams, who have been following Bonds and the steroid scandal since day one.

What stands out to me is that Sports Illustrated has its name splattered across every major sports site in North America.  This issue will sell, the book will sell.  SI didn’t do this reporting, Fainaru-Wada and Williams did for their book, but SI will be printing some details first.  SI will get attention, some attention it definitely needs in this web/mobile phone/ESPN sports world.

Will this just be a flash in sales for SI, or can SI leverage this situation into something more?

Posted by David M Singer on Mar 07, 2006 at 07:27 PM
SportsBaseballPermalink

Thursday, January 19, 2006

ESPN.com Changes Front Page

ESPN.com has changed the layout of their front page.  The layout looks more like the insides pages of the site now with the horizontal menu (something I’m considering for my heavy content sites).  The layout is now very similar to Sportsline and even major news sites like CNN.com.

Sportsline and TSN made layout changes over the summer.

ESPN’s new layout looks good.  It’s less cluttered and easier to read in my opinion.  I’m a little too tired to write up a big review, but I did just want to stop by and give a thumbs up.

I’m still not sure I’m going to visit it like I used to.  The auto-playing of commercials on some of the inside sections (like the NHL) is something I despise.  It’s not the video, although I’m not a fan of that either simply due to system resources and bandwidth - it’s the sound.  I can’t visit these pages in an office and it’s just an annoyance at home when it’s unexpected.  I have little doubt these ads pay a ton, but let me activate them on my own by actually wanting to watch videos that appear after the spot (a brief commercial beforehand is understood by me, I’m not an advertisement hater).  User initiated playing would be very nice.

Another thing to note: ESPN.com went with an RSS/XML button (it used to be just XML).  It’s orange and white and foreground/background flips for each abbreviation.  I’m still waiting for the first major site to use the feed icon that FireFox uses and IE will be adding.  They also have text RSS links above each news section on the front page.

Posted by David M Singer on Jan 19, 2006 at 02:28 AM
TechSports2 CommentsPermalink

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Who Invented the Modern Baseball Bat?

David Pinto over at Baseball Musings gave me a pointer to this Jim Caple article about baseball bats.

Caple ordered replicas of bats originally made for Honus Wagner, “Shoeless” Joe Jackson, Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth.

This part caught my eye:

There are two main things you notice when you pick up these bats. One, they’re big. The Ruth and Shoeless Joe bats are 36 inches long and weigh 38-40 ounces, depending on whose scale you trust. Next, with the exception of the Ruth bat, the handles are much thicker than modern bats. Scott Spiezio measured the Shoeless Joe bat against his own and found that Jackson’s handle was almost as thick as his is at the trademark. There are Hickory Farms beef sticks that are thinner. The Cobb and Wagner bats also have almost no knobs.

I was thinking none of the bats other than Ruth’s would have a knob.  Multiple times I’ve heard Ruth is credited for inventing the modern bat - with a knob on the end.

Ruth played from 1914-1935Shoeless Joe played from 1908-1920.

That’s a decent overlap for Jackson using a bat that Ruth supposedly brought to the scene, but some Google image seaching let me find this picture:
Joe Showing Us How To Lay One Down”, dated 1912, from this page: Pictures of Shoeless Joe Jackson

That website even sells a replica of “Black Betsy”, Shoeless Joe’s bat.  Louisville Slugger made three of them for Jackson back in 1915 according to the site, although Ruth’s career had started by then.

However - if there are early picture of Jackson with all his bats having knobs on them - why is Ruth given credit for making the modern bat?  Was it also a skinnier handle?

I love reading about Ruth, I’m a fan like many others, just looking for some clarification here.

Continue reading "Who Invented the Modern Baseball Bat?"

Posted by David M Singer on Jul 27, 2005 at 02:48 PM
SportsBaseball0 CommentsPermalink

Thursday, July 21, 2005

Tommy Hates the Phillie Phanatic

Seriously, he really does.  Too bad his players didn’t.

Posted by David M Singer on Jul 21, 2005 at 02:08 PM
SportsBaseballPermalink

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Sports Sites Revamp

Both CBS Sportsline and TSN have given their websites redesigns this week.

Sportsline has been given more of tweaking.  A bit of a cleaner look overall, I definitely like it and think it’s easier to read.  The front of the site has been designed for a 1024x768 layout.  The rightside column doesn’t have too much sports-related content though.  Mostly promos for CBS Sports TV, CBS News and CBS TV’s nightly schedule.  The inside pages have the cleaner headers, but are still designed for 800x600 resolutions, however the expanded layout may still be coming, could just be a staggered rollout.

TSN was given more of a facelift.  They also expanded the front page to cater to the 1024x768 audience and now there’s content everywhere.  It’s a bit too crowded and even moreso on FireFox compared to IE (especially the menu).  I can’t imagine they won’t fix that soon.  There’s also a javascript error, but that looks like it’s due to one of their ad scripts.  None of the other pages I visited seemed to be redone yet.

ESPN re-did their own site not too long ago, so I would expect it to be at least another year before another change is made.

Fox Sports and Sports Illustrated are still the only major sports sites that still have front pages that have designs catered to people using 800x600 resolution settings.

Posted by David M Singer on Jun 29, 2005 at 04:07 PM
TechSportsPermalink

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

ISAPI Rewrite Convert for AllPosters.com PostersFeed

For quite some time I had a posters page on hockeyfights.com as an affiliate of allposters.com (affiliate link).

At first, I created a series of manual links from a text file they had.  I downloaded preview images and the info needed, dumped some of it into a db and had a couple of pages.

It became a bit much to keep up with, so I stopped.  I took a little piece of code from their affiliate website and just had an iframe that displayed a few top sellers that someone could scroll through.  Not really ideal, but no work involved.

Eventually allposters.com released a datafeed.  You download a series of files (text, csv or xml) and have all their store information.  You can then easily dump it into a database (or use the files as they are if you like) and can build a relatively dynamic store from that.  Images and such are all stored on their site and locations/names are referenced in the datafeed files.  I wanted to do something with it, but never got around to it.

Semi-recently allposters.com released web services.  Web services allow you to access all of their store info on their own machines.  No more frequent manual updates.  While I know I’d still have to update some code now and then, this was ideal and I wanted to take advantage of this to make a nice looking store front for my users.

Instead of building from the ground up I looked for an already built solution.  I found a few ok ones and then I came upon PostersFeed XML by One Click Designs (demo store).  It was neat and a good base for me to work with.  I also liked that they offered Posters Feed Professional, which is the same script, but with a slight modification for mod_rewrite, allowing you to have cleaner urls (so besides looking nicer, they can be copy and pasted easier, and search engines will follow them easier).  mod_rewrite is Apache web server-only.  However, Helicon has made an alternative for us IIS users: ISAPI Rewrite.  I use it a good deal already.  I don’t run Wordpress anymore, but when I did I had a good set of rules that allowed me to do the same url rewrite as Apache users.

So with Posters Feed Professional and ISAPI Rewrite, and a few other conversions to the base script I was able to build a nice hockey posters store for hockeyfights.com.  I’m not completely finished with it yet.  I will probably add a few more “convenience” links on the right, along with replacing the ad up top with a posters ad (or perhaps a Google Adsense ad).  I also plan on having posters come up on actual team and player pages when applicable.  This is something that will require a bit more work, but should look pretty good when done (along with hopefully producing some nice conversion rates).

I’d love to post the code for the ISAPI Rewrite modification, but One Click Designs charges for the mod_rewrite tweaks (the base script is free, although they ask you sign up for the affiliate program through them so you would be a child affiliate of theirs at no cost to you).  Because the ISAPI Rewrite script isn’t that different from it’s mod_rewrite counterpart I’d basically be giving their script away for free, which is something I obviously shouldn’t do.  However, if you look at a few conversions (like the Wordpress one, or a few on Helicon’s forums), it shouldn’t be too hard for you to do the conversion yourself.

Here’s an allposters.com webmaster affiliate link, in case you’re looking to sign up as an allposters.com affiliate yourself.

Posted by David M Singer on Apr 27, 2005 at 03:58 PM
TechSportsHockey0 CommentsPermalink

Friday, April 22, 2005

Be Like Mike

Not Jordan, you’re never going to be like him.  But Michael Vick?  Maybe you could swing that.

To help get you started is the Ron Mexico Name Generator.  Learn more about Ron Mexico.

Oh, I’m Buster Italy, in case the legend ever gets told to you.

Posted by David M Singer on Apr 22, 2005 at 03:40 PM
SportsFootballPermalink

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Pushing Paid Content

If you head over to espn.com right now you’ll see lead stories of baseball streaks and slumps at the beginning of the season.

Out of the five stories contained in the main story area on the front page, four are accessible only to ESPN’s “in” members.

espn.com screenshot

I think paid subscriptions is a good business model for many websites.  For some sites it means no advertisements, for others it means premium content (a la espn.com).  Either way, you’re usually diversifying revenue sources (generally, it means a site is not relying solely on ads).  Slow sports news day or not, pushing your paid service by using the main content area such as this has to be as much of a turn-off to most of the audience as it is a turn-on to new members.

So is having however many new signups worth driving others away?  For espn.com, I’d say the answer is most likely yes.  Sports sites, and certainly ones like espn.com, can be extremely sticky.  News sites in general have large return audiences and sports fans can be rabid.  Chances are a one-day (or just a few hour) push to attract new paid members won’t do anything to traffic long-term.  Sending some users to alternatives like Sportsline, Fox Sports or Sports Illustrated on a day where little is happening shouldn’t have any impact on tomorrow.  However, if ESPN were to continue it’s push for a few consecutive days they might start to see a decline in traffic, at least for a brief period of time.

Posted by David M Singer on Apr 19, 2005 at 05:13 PM
TechSportsPermalink

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Hating the Red Sox

Everyone already hates the Yankees, I know that being a Yankees fan.  David Schoenfield hates the Yankees too, but he’s starting to hate the Red Sox as well.  Schoenfeld lists his 86 reasons for hating the Sox on ESPN.com’s Page 2.

Posted by David M Singer on Apr 12, 2005 at 06:46 PM
SportsBaseball1 CommentPermalink

Sunday, April 03, 2005

It Only Took Two

One game, one complaint and it took all of two batters to happen.  ESPN2 is airing the opening game of the baseball season, Red Sox at Yankees, which I’m sure you’ve heard about 1000 times by now.  Well, Edgar Renteria is the second batter of the game, and he takes a pitch.  ESPN whips out their nifty K-Zone to show us the location of a pitch Renteria didn’t swing at (to make him 1-2).  The audience then proceeds to miss the strikeout pitch.

ESPN did not make the same mistake when the next batter, Manny Ramirez, struck out as well.

Update: Tino Martinez comes in to play first base for Jason Giambi.  In his first inning of action he makes a great play to end the inning.  The Tino-loving Bronx crowd goes nuts.  Instead of being treated to a replay (and all I’m asking for is one), we get to see Sam Ryan introducing Fat Joe for ESPN’s new “Soundcheck” segment.  Yipee.  We don’t see a replay when they come back from commercial either.  Go

MTV

ESPN.

Posted by David M Singer on Apr 03, 2005 at 09:12 PM
SportsBaseballTelevisionPermalink
Page 3 of 6 pages  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  Last ›