MLB.TV Leaves Me Confused
Baseball’s a great game to focus on, or simply leave on in the background. Some like to work to music, as do I, but I like to have a game on in the background as well (when I can).
So I purchased a season pass from MLB.TV. My first complaint - right off the bat - the only subscriptions I could find, a monthly ($14.95) or season-long ($79.95) pass, are both automatic renewal subscriptions. They’re good about making it clear, but it’d be a hell of a lot nicer if that was an option.
So I start clicking around and test out a few streams. They look pretty nice. It looks like they’re using Windows Media version 9 and have a good 350k/sec feed (after initially buffering, I haven’t had it stutter again). I can use it in FireFox, which is nice too. CNN tells me I don’t have Windows Media 9, glad to see that’s not on my end. Hopefully the picture quality will continue once the season starts. I’m sure there’s less traffic on these preseason games. There’s a simple linescore next to the video. MLB.com has some nice gamecasts (they call it MLB Gameday, like the video game), why not have a miniversion of that next to the video, so I can easily go through stats from that game? I realize there could be some syncing issues, but if the data is available let’s get some in there, I don’t want to have to open yet another window (that might have to go over the video).
I decided to test out a radio feed and I see that’s a completely separate package. Another $14.95 for the season of radio. I thought perhaps they’d throw that into season TV passes, and if not, maybe there’d be a combo package option, even if it’s just a few bucks off.
Some might wonder why I’d want radio feeds since I already get the TV feed. The answer is just one of connection strength. If my connection goes to crap the radio stream has a much better chance of coming in clearly. I’m assuming it’s much less k/sec, if someone out there can let me know, that’d be great.
What they do have is a package called All Access. You get both TV and radio plus condensed games and searchable video. MLB.com advertises it as “The Best of Both Worlds”. The price is $99.95 - both worlds plus $5. I didn’t find this package until after my purchase, and I would have gotten it, because despite the fact that it’s not the best deal, I’m still after all access, I’m still after convenience. I’ll call support and see if they’re good about switching my plan. My recommendation is to list this on the page you land on after clicking the link titled “subscribe to live TV” on MLB.com’s home page. I’d think their most complete package would be listed everywhere.
Something else I’m completely confused about: local blackouts. What’s the point? Any feed I watched, I still saw commericals - is this really to protect local cable company (or sattelite company) subscriptions? Do they think they’re going to lose customers because I’m buying the MLB.TV package instead of basic cable (plus the sports network, if necessary)? What’s really ridiculous is there’s no override. You could purchase the highest possible cable package plus MLB Extra Innings (out of area games on TV) and it wouldn’t make a difference.
I still feel like they’re pushing this as some form of TV-alternative instead of something that could complement it. I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s just looking for a way to grab a game on the go or watch an at-bat when the TV is already being used. The Extra Innings package is currently $159 for the season. Why not have some real All-Access package, even if it’s just tacking on current online prices, where I could get MLB Extra Innings and the internet features and then give me access to local games online? Then they know no one’s “losing” my money and I’m finally getting closer to real all access.
MLB is coming out with mobile features soon. I’m curious as to how that will be priced and if it’ll be packaged with anything else.
Comments:
Next entry: Non-Existant MLB.tv Support
Previous entry: Re-Established Importance